Girth and Birth Control

August 30, 2007

Most oral contraceptives contain synthetic forms of two hormones – estrogen and progesterone. They prevent the ovaries from releasing an egg (ovulation), and cause the cervical mucus to thicken, making it harder for sperm to reach the egg. In addition, in case fertilization occurs, the two hormones make the lining of the uterus less receptive to implantation.

For women who can’t take estrogen, there is a progestin-only birth control pill. These pills thicken the cervical mucus.

More than 10 million women in the U.S are using birth control pills. But despite their use, pregnancy can still occur. If birth control pills are used as directed, they are more than 99 percent effective in preventing pregnancy. In actual use, however, the pills are reported to be about 92 percent effective. The discrepancy between ideal and actual use occurs because women may forget to take a dose or the hormones may not be absorbed properly (because of illness or interference from other medications).

Effect of Weight on Birth Control Pills
Research strongly suggests body weight may influence the effectiveness of birth control pills. Some studies show overweight and obese women using oral contraceptives have twice the risk of an unintended pregnancy compared to normal weight women.

Discount Pharmacy - Buy Pharmacy at discount prices including free shipping.Discount Pharmacy provides confortable and easy way to order discount pharmacy online.

Alison Edelman, M.D., an OB/GYN Researcher at Oregon Health & Science University, says, unlike many other types of medication, birth control pills don’t come in different strengths. So doctors can’t adjust the dose for a woman’s weight. She wants to find out if birth control pills work differently in obese women compared with thinner women.

The study is looking for two groups of women taking oral contraceptives – those with a BMI of less than 25 (the thin women) and those with a BMI higher than 30 (the obese women). Participants will take birth control pills and have a urine test to check for pregnancy and blood test to check for ovulation. In addition, doctors will measure hormone and medication levels.

Preliminary findings suggest, compared to normal weight women, the obese women have different levels of birth control medication in their blood. The reason for the difference isn’t known. However, the lower level of circulating medication in the overweight women may account for the higher rates of unplanned pregnancy.

The researchers are still analyzing the results. Edelman says increasing the dose of the oral contraceptive isn’t the best solution because that could increase a woman’s risk for blood clots and stroke. Until a better answer is found, she recommends overweight women be aware they may be at higher risk for birth control failure and consider using a second form of birth control.

Posted by toshko under Yasmin News | Comments (0)

 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Woman who gave unsolicited birth control advice sentenced for trespassing

August 26, 2007

Laura Stevens, who took it upon herself to advise a mother with six children about contraception at a bus station, was found guilty of trespassing and sentenced in Justice Court Friday to 14 hours of community service.
Judge Cheryl Russell’s ruling came after the 76-year-old, representing herself, told the judge that the trespassing case is “not worth 10 minutes.”
“This is such a tiny incident,” testified Stevens, who was wearing a T-shirt that featured photos of undernourished children in a third-world country along with the words, “All children have the right to food and basic health.”
“I was trying to help a woman who needed help. She needed to know that she could get contraception.”
On June 20, Stevens said she felt sorry for a woman with six youngsters who were “out of control” at the Logan Transit District (LTD) bus station. Stevens said she and the unidentified mother are the only two people who know what was said during their brief encounter.
The woman apparently didn’t appreciate the advice and complained to transit officials who asked Stevens to leave. She was informed by a law-enforcement officer that she would be arrested for trespassing if she returned or boarded a bus before her privileges were reinstated.
Stevens did return several times, and, on June 26,

Internet Pharmacy - Buy Pharmacy at reasanoble prices.Internet Pharmacy provides confortable and easy way to order pharmacy via internet.

Logan police officer Slade Gurr intervened.
“She requested that I take her to jail,” Gurr testified. After refusing both of her requests for incarceration, Gurr said he cited her for trespassing.
At pretrial conference with Logan City prosecution earlier this month, Stevens ignored her attorney’s recommendation to plead no contest to the trespassing charge. She declined a plea agreement, and American Civil Liberties Union attorney Nathan Hult withdrew from defending her.
“Is it illegal to speak to a woman sitting on a bench?” Stevens said Friday, arguing that her First Amendment rights were violated.
Prosecuting attorney Lee Edwards said the case has nothing to do with free speech.
“Free speech is very important, but you don’t have the right to bother other people,” Edwards said. “It is not the content of the speech that is the problem. The issue here is trespassing. Nothing more. If someone with apparent authority asks you to stay off the premises, Utah law requires you to stay off.”
Judge Russell agreed and denied Stevens’ motion to dismiss the charge.
“I’m glad you’re not going to fine me because I’m penniless,” Stevens told the judge. Stevens, who said she graduated from the University of Utah with a degree in sociology when she was 72, said she just might appeal the case.
If not, she will use the community-service sentence to benefit her cause - world overpopulation. With her LTD bus-riding privileges restored, Stevens should have no problem getting to and from her destination - the Planned Parenthood office in Logan.

Posted by toshko under Yasmin News | Comments (0)

 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Birth Control After Pregnancy - A Must For Your And Your Child’s Wellbeing

August 23, 2007

For you and your child’s wellbeing, you have to take an informed decision regarding birth control after pregnancy. There are many types of birth control methods available in the market today; however, only some of these methods will suit your body. It thus becomes imperative that you weigh the pros and cons of various birth control methods before you choose one.

After the pregnancy period is over your hormones will undergo dramatic changes. Some women will not show any interest in sex, while others will witness an increase in their sex drive. Physically most women are fit to have sex two weeks after giving birth, as the vagina typically takes two weeks to heal and the cervix also closes by this time.

If you are interested in sex after pregnancy, you should understand that there is a huge chance that you could get pregnant again even two weeks after giving birth. Therefore, you have to choose your contraception carefully. Ask your doctor if it is absolutely okay for you to have sex.

Lactational Amenorrhea Method

There are basically four types of birth control after pregnancy methods that women can choose from. Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM), also called the breastfeeding method, can be used by women who are nursing and have not had their menstrual cycle after pregnancy. For this method to be effective you need to breastfeed your baby from both breasts every four hours and in the night every six hours. This method of birth control while breastfeeding works for six months after the baby is born and then you would have to shift to contraception.

Pharmacy - Buy Pharmacy at discount prices including free shipping.Discount Pharmacy provides confortable and easy way to order discount pharmacy online.Barrier Methods

Barrier methods for birth control after pregnancy include condoms, female condoms, sponges, diaphragms, cervical caps, and shields. They would not cause any harm to your nursing infant.

Hormonal Methods

The hormonal methods for birth control after pregnancy should be taken after careful considerations. If you are nursing, you should not take combination hormone treatment that has estrogen or ethinyl estradiol in it. You can pass on the estrogen to your baby via the breast milk. Progestin-only methods of birth control, like mini-pills, Depo-Provera, etc. are often said to be safe for both you and your baby; however, some doctors claim that progestin can also be passed on to your baby.

IUD

Intra Uterine Devices, like Copper IUD, are safe and effective birth control devices. An IUD will not have any affect on your breast milk, so you can use it even while nursing.

Besides the above mentioned methods you can do what many other women do - keep track of your fertility cycle. Your doctor can help you learn about your fertility cycle. Then all you need to do is abstain from sex on your unsafe days.

Birth control will ensure that you do not get pregnant again soon after giving birth. This will give you time to properly look after yourself and your baby. Most importantly this will also give you time to get back into shape so that you look good after pregnancy. Talk to your doctor about birth control after pregnancy and decide accordingly.

Taking adequate steps for birth control after pregnancy is necessary if you want to maintain your health and your child’s as well. Today women have many birth control options to choose from after they witness resumption of menstrual cycle after pregnancy. All you have to do is weigh the pros and cons carefully and then make your decision. Visit Pregnancy for more on issues such as birth control while breastfeeding, look good after pregnancy and sex after pregnancy besides all other information you would like to have about pregnancy and childbirth.

Posted by toshko under Yasmin News | Comments (0)

 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

BBC’s fight to resist devolution in broadcasting

August 19, 2007

In his autobiography written several years after the event, John Birt, the former director-general of the BBC, describes graphically how the proposal from BBC Scotland’s management for a Scottish Six was rejected in 1998, despite the wishes of the Scottish BBC, the Broadcasting Council for Scotland and Scottish politicians.

Admitting his own deep resistance to the proposal for devolution in broadcasting, he tells of the deep involvement of the Westminster establishment in this - how he arranged a meeting with Tony Blair to resist any such moves, and how Mr Blair’s words were: “Let’s fight.”

According to Mr Birt, “Mr Blair agreed that Peter Mandelson would marshal Labour’s forces Labour held the line”. He even suggests that, to this end, “Gordon Brown wrote a series of carefully argued, high-ground articles for the Scottish papers, advocating the virtues of the Union from Scotland’s perspective”. William Hague was similarly supportive, although his Scottish party (like the other Scottish political parties) was not - all north-of-the-border parties being sympathetic to more devolution within the BBC.

advertisement

do_dp_ad(); on error resume next If MSDetect = “true” Then For i = 2 to 8 If Not(IsObject(CreateObject(”ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash.” & i))) Then Else flashinstalled = 2 flashversion = i End If Next End If If flashinstalled = 0 Then flashinstalled = 1 End If

Mr Birt’s colonial language of the time comes over when he dismisses the work of the Broadcasting Council for Scotland - which, since the 1950s, had sought to bring some democratic dialogue with the BBC from the point of view of licence-payers - as simply a body that would often “spit”, which “worked behind the scenes to increase its power, to seize control of local and network programmes and to wrest budgets away from the centre of the BBC”, and which served up an “incessant tirade of bile, vitriol and abuse” when meeting the BBC governors. Needless to say, this is not a description that anyone knowing the Broadcasting Council or today’s Audience Council would recognise.

Mr Birt’s solution - tried over the past 10 years - that a major programme of education and new processes instigated in the BBC would ensure the BBC’s programme-makers and news decisions-takers would be more alert to Scottish sensitivities has been insufficient, as respective viewing figures for the BBC Six in Scotland (falling) and Reporting Scotland (holding more steady) have shown. All of this is despite major efforts and sterling work from the BBC itself in Scotland.

Scottish opinion has moved on in the 10 years it has taken for Mr Birt’s approach to fail. It’s good that the debate has been re-opened.

Dr Douglas Chalmers, Lecturer in Media Policy, Cultural Business Division, Glasgow Caledonian University, 70 Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow.

Alex Salmond’s call for broadcasting to be devolved to the Scottish Parliament is eminently sensible and simple common sense.

The current broadcasting arrangements for Scotland have played a key part in our incomplete sense of self-confidence, and in order to become the truly ambitious and creative country we aspire to be requires broadcasting to be returned to its rightful place: the Scottish Parliament.

Internet Pharmacy - Buy Pharmacy at reasanoble prices.Internet Pharmacy provides confortable and easy way to order pharmacy via internet.The opportunities associated with broadcasting and television production, at the very heart of our creative industries, are immense. A recent report by The Work Foundation for the UK government’s Department for Culture, Media and Sport makes clear how important the creative industries are, rivalling financial services in terms of scale and growth, acting as a major employer and a huge generator of wealth.

Writer and producer Richard Curtis highlighted the scale and potential of the creative sector when he said: “Every section of theatre and radio, TV and film feed each other. Each depends upon the other - without four strong industries, the others would suffer dramatically.”

In order for these four pillars to be in place in Scotland, allowing the full cultural and economic benefits of our creative sector to be felt, requires our parliament to have control over broadcasting.

Alex Orr, 35 Bryson Road, Edinburgh.

Greg Dyke once infamously declared that “the British Broadcasting Corporation is the glue which binds the United Kingdom together”. That statement may go some way to explain why the Minister for the Office of Scotland in a State, David Cairns MP, is now claiming that it is “parochial”, “narrow” and “backward-looking” to want Scotland to control broadcasts to the Scots nation.

NRK is the public-service broadcaster in Norway and RTE is the public-service broadcaster in Ireland. Does David Cairns believe the Norwegians are parochial for not wanting to watch news coverage about items such as how the Swedish cricket team is doing or what the latest local health proposals are from the government of Sweden? Likewise, is it backward-looking of Ireland to have RTE, which is shortly about to launch an international edition? Both Norway and Ireland are lucky in that they are independent nation states, a club to which we Scots will also soon belong.

Meanwhile, it is time to bring broadcasting power home to the nation of John Logie Baird and get rid of the giant cringe that holds back our country.

William Henderson, 2 Torrin Road, Summerston, Glasgow.

The current debate about a Scottish Six newscast sees the Scottish cringe at its absolute apex. This bizarre debate couldn’t take place in any other country.

The notion that Portugal would have its news through Madrid or Holland through Brussels or Ireland through London rightly would be judged absurd in those countries. The belief apparently shared by the ill-informed (or the deliberately misinformed) that what is happening in Ipswich or Ealing is somehow more compelling or more important than what is happening in Bothwell or Uddingston, or that newscasters broadcasting out of Glasgow or Edinburgh are less able to read the international news than those sitting in studios in London, is complete nonsense.

The suggestion repeated by a number of Unionist apologists that we don’t have the talent to do a Scottish Six is an insult.

A Scottish Six is being opposed purely and simply because London would lose control of what we are being fed.

David McEwan Hill, 1 Tom Nan Ragh, Dalinlongar, Sandbank, Argyll.

Posted by toshko under Yasmin News | Comments (0)

 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY)

August 10, 2007

Evidently, some international funding agencies continue to impose as funding requirements the adoption by our country of anti-life population control programs and policies. The alarming aspect here is that these policies are now being presented as pro-life since they allegedly promote health, eliminate violence against women and even prevent abortion and other sexually transmissible diseases. The program is now called “population management” while birth control has been more euphemistically designated as “reproductive health”.

More alarming yet is that these international agencies, specifically the United Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA) are now turning their sights at the policy makers in the grassroots level — the municipal and city councils of the local government units (LGU). They believe that these bodies are more vulnerable and easily swayed to adopt their population policies. And with many LGUs eventually adopting their own population control programs, they are convinced that the passage of several pending House Bills (Nos. 1808 and 3422 in 2004 and 261 and 3773 in 2005) that they are pushing but have so far encountered rough sailing in the Lower House committees would be facilitated.

Significantly, the first known LGU to adopt these population control policies is Olongapo City. The City indeed seems to be a logical choice for this pilot project. Its high population growth rate is obviously tied up to its past reputation and history as the site of a former naval base and the favorite “R and R” destination of visiting or stationed members of the US and other foreign armed forces. Under these circumstances, it is quite easy to persuade the city council to adopt a population control program. Thus was born the Olongapo City Reproductive Health Code (the Code).

But in its passage, a lone voice reverberated loud enough to register his opposition to the Code. Even if he was overpowered by sheer force of numbers, his arguments were so forceful that they jarred the conscience of his colleagues and rattled them to the point of ganging up on him and initiating his recall as duly elected councilor of Olongapo City. He is John Carlos G. de los Reyes, a young professional who was elected in the last elections under the Kapatiran Party.

At first glance, this Code looks so laudable and beneficial to Olongapo and its residents especially the women, as it will supposedly promote their health and prevent sexually related diseases. But de los Reyes clearly expressed his apprehension to his colleagues by citing certain policy statements on which the ordinance finds its mandate. And this is embodied in its whereas clause declaring that “there is a need to curb the population growth rate for better population management” and that “unmet family planning needs due to shortage of supplies may contribute to the looming surge in the City’s population in the near future”.

De los Reyes then exposed the flaws of the ordinance centering on the inexistence of the problem it is trying to solve; equating this inexistent problem as the cause of the other problem of poverty; and the adverse consequences of the proposed solutions.

Maybe those who are still advocating population control should consider de los Reyes’ timely and valid warning. He said that: “Population control is the wrong solution to the wrong problem. The root social problem of our nation is not over-population but massive, enslaving poverty. Philippine poverty cannot be the result of a growing population, but rather the outcome of corruption in both government and business sectors. Both government and business conspire to put half of the national wealth and income in the hands of less than 1% of the population. We are poor not because we are many, but because only a few wittingly or unwittingly deprive our kababayans of opportunities to prosper….Contrary to what many say, our country is not overpopulated. Rather, the national problem has always been the concentration of wealth and opportunity in major urban centers, such as Manila, Baguio, Angeles, Davao, Cebu,…Olongapo? This condition gives rise to congestion, lack of resources and crime.

Internet Pharmacy - Buy Pharmacy at reasanoble prices.Internet Pharmacy provides confortable and easy way to order pharmacy via internet.Our country has already reached the point of “demographic transition” when the rate of growth reverses to a gradual decline. Furthermore, a definitive study of the Population Council in New York as early as 1982 concludes that the greatest factor influencing fertility decline is not a government-managed population control program. Between 35% and 45% of fertility decline is attributable to modernization, or the attainment of higher levels of human welfare and quality of life. Approximately 25 to 35% of fertility decline is induced by the simple factor of delaying the age at marriage, and 15 to 25% by the simple recourse of breast-feeding. None of these factors intrude into the health of people or violate the sacredness of life. Only between 2% and 5% of fertility decline is attributable to “managed population control.”

Then, backed up by statistics, he pointed out that the population control policy embodied in the ordinance is totally unnecessary because: “The Philippines’ annual population growth rate is not, as many claim, 2.36% but between 1.61% (United Nations, 2003) and 1.99% (Philippine National Statistics Office, 2004). The total fertility rate, or the average number of children per woman of reproductive age in her lifetime, is not 3.22; within 10 years, this rate will, on its own momentum, decrease to 2.15 (United Nations Population Division, March 12, 2005). By then, the Philippine population will begin to decline in absolute numbers, as fewer births replace the number of deaths annually.”

Finally, de los Reyes brought out the adverse consequences of the reproductive health code. He said that: “population control bills, by their advocacy of “reproductive health” and “reproductive rights” will slowly render the Philippines captive to an official language and ethic that accept abortion as a legitimate human right just like in the United States and Europe and probably in almost all countries in the world. This language and ethic were made official in the United Nations through the 1994 World Population Conference in Cairo against which Jaime Cardinal Sin, led over 2 million Catholics and Muslims in an historical protest rally on August 14, 1994.

Besides its flaw of not significantly contributing to the alleviation of poverty, artificial birth control is highly expensive: their financial costs are recurrent and expanding due to complications; their chemical side effects, such as physical illness and emotional depression are injurious to the health of women; and their moral consequences are damaging — particularly the sexual promiscuity bred by what their advocates falsely call “safe sex”….

The significant failure rates of abortifacients also induce their users to ultimately resort to what we all agree to be an abomination — abortion. Please note that all countries that legislated the use of abortifacients eventually legalized abortion”.

True to the pro-life platform of his Ang Kapatiran Party, de los Reyes courageously acts as its lone torch bearer in that part of our country still enmeshed in the polluted world of politics. He may be a solitary figure but his light shines brightly enough to keep the hopes in the hearts of Filipinos still burning. May his tribe increase.

Posted by toshko under Yasmin News | Comments (0)

 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

China Bans Crude Birth Control Slogans

August 7, 2007

China has banned crude and insensitive slogans promoting the country’s ‘one-child’ family planning policy, such as “Raise fewer babies but more piggies,” which have stoked anger in rural areas, state media said Sunday.

China’s 28 year old family planning policy limits most urban couples to just one child and allows some families in the countryside to have a second child if their first is a girl.

Discount Pharmacy - Buy Pharmacy at discount prices including free shipping.Discount Pharmacy provides confortable and easy way to order discount pharmacy online.

Critics say that has led to forced abortions and sterilizations and a dangerously imbalanced sex ratio due to the traditional preference for male heirs, which has prompted countless families to abort female fetuses in hopes of getting boys.

© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Posted by toshko under Yasmin News | Comments (0)

 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Contraception to control pigeons

August 2, 2007

Hollywood’s out-of-control pigeon population is to be targeted with a birth-control product.

The pigeon population has boomed in Hollywood recently, with an estimated 5,000 birds living in the area.

But now residents are going to use OvoControl P, a drug which interferes with egg development, to try and cut their numbers, reports Metro.

‘We think we’ve got a good solution to a bad situation,’ said Laura Dodson, president of the Argyle Civic Association, the group leading the new campaign.

Discount Pharmacy - Buy Pharmacy at discount prices including free shipping.Discount Pharmacy provides confortable and easy way to order discount pharmacy online.The numbers of pigeons have become ‘unmanageable’ and they hope this could be the answer.

The population growth has been partly blamed on a woman known locally as the ‘Bird Lady’ who has dumped large bags of pigeon feed in dozens of areas.

It is thought it is the first time the drug has been used in the United States to target pigeons and it is hoped the numbers of pigeons will be cut by at least a half by 2012.

Posted by toshko under Yasmin News | Comments (0)

 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

College students face rising birth-control prices

July 29, 2007

But colleges and universities say the drug companies have stopped offering the discounts, and are now charging the schools much more. The change has an unlikely origin: the Deficit Reduction Act signed by President Bush last year. The legislation aimed to pare $39 billion in spending on federal programs, from subsidized student loans to Medicaid. And among the changes was one that, through an arcane set of circumstances, created a disincentive for drug makers to offer school discounts.The contraceptive prices offered to schools are now included in a complex calculation that determines certain Medicaid-related rebates that drug makers must pay to states. In this calculation, deep discount prices would have the effect of increasing drug makers’ payments.

Colleges and universities say the change is having a significant impact on their health centers and the students they serve. Prices have begun skyrocketing for many popular brands of birth control. Health centers are having to reconfigure their offerings and write new prescriptions. And college students are making some tough choices, such as switching to cheaper generic brands or forgoing their privacy in order to claim their pills on their parents’ insurance.

The changes actually took effect earlier this year, but when it became clear to college health providers that the economics were going to change, many of them stocked up on several months’ worth of supply. Only lately has that cheaper supply begun petering out. Some students started seeing the steeper prices last spring and some are dealing with it now during summer sessions, while others won’t see it until they return for the fall semester.

In recent months, at Michigan State University, East Lansing, the price of Ortho Evra, a birth-control skin patch by Johnson & Johnson, more than doubled to $50 for a month’s prescription from $20 last year. At the University of Iowa in Iowa City, Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo, a low-estrogen pill also by J&J, rose to $52 recently — from $16 last year. The University of Texas at Austin now charges more than $50 for Organon Inc.’s popular NuvaRing, a monthly vaginal device, from $12.

To save money, at the University of Iowa, about three-fourths of students on Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo — a pill that has no generic form — have switched to a less-expensive option.

Such changes concern health professionals, who fear that switching is going to lead to unintended pregnancies by women who are less likely to consistently take a daily pill. “One of the seminal concepts in contraceptive medicine is when a woman is using a method correctly and successfully, the last thing you want to do is change her from that,” says Lee Shulman, board chairman of the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals. “You don’t want to change her unless there is an absolute medical necessity to do so.”

He says even switching from one type of daily pill to another can pose new risks for side effects and discomfort, potentially leading women to stop taking it.

Susan Maly, a 22-year-old student at the University of Iowa, says she struggled with switching pills recently. When she went to her college health center to get a refill on her Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo prescription a few months ago, she was distressed to find out that it had gone up to $54 from about $18. Starting this month, she has switched to a cheaper generic pill that has higher levels of estrogen than the Lo brand.

“That was an issue for me,” says Ms. Maly, but she says she will see how things work out for a couple of months. Initially, she says she felt some heartburn side effects from the new pill, but that has since gone away. She finds the dramatic price increase “unfair” to women who have come to rely on birth control, and feel comfortable with the brand they are on.

“This is the one thing that many females on campus are getting from student health,” says Ms. Maly. “It felt like we were a target.”

Internet Pharmacy - Buy Pharmacy at reasanoble prices.Internet Pharmacy provides confortable and easy way to order pharmacy via internet.At drug maker Organon, Nick Hart, executive director for contraception, says, “On the one hand, it’s a tremendous disservice to our customers, our young women.” But he says that providing low-cost access to young consumers has to be balanced with “our fiduciary responsibility. It puts us in an untenable position.”

A Johnson & Johnson spokeswoman said, “As a result of this new legislation,” only institutions that qualify as “safety net” providers under the law will get the company’s discounted prices. Safety-net providers include certain facilities that serve low-income families. She added, “We are one of the lowest-cost providers of contraceptives to public health services.”

Health professionals say it’s particularly critical for college women to have access to cheap contraception. Two-thirds of college students reported having at least one sexual partner in the prior 12 months, according to a fall 2006 survey of more than 23,000 students by the American College Health Association. Condoms have been available free on many campuses, and are considered the best form of contraception for preventing sexually transmitted infections.

“Maybe, if more people switch from hormonal methods to condoms, we may see a positive outcome of fewer STI’s,” says Mary Hoban, a project director for the American College Health Association. “But from a contraceptive standpoint, we may see more unintended pregnancy. It’s a double-edged sword.”

About 40 percent of sexually active college women reported relying on pills and other prescription forms of birth control, according to the ACHA data.

“College women are at the highest risk for unintended pregnancy because they’re sexually active, they’re very fertile, and they are away from home,” says Dr. Shulman, adding that students count on their health service for a host of reasons, from counseling to testing for sexually transmitted diseases, to birth-control prescriptions.

Many young women turn to their college health centers for these services because of the privacy it affords as much as the convenience and pricing. Theresa Spalding, medical director at UT Austin’s University Health Services, says that “now, at the higher price, they are faced with having to decide, ‘Do I involve my parents?”‘ in order to get insurance coverage.

College health centers also say the change threatens to lessen the quality of service they can provide, since the price increases have eaten into the profits that they make. Pamela Houle, administrative director for the health center at Skidmore College in Saratoga Springs, N.Y., says the health center now subsidizes each NuvaRing by about $4. “Previously, we were making $17 a ring.” That may mean fewer educational resources and materials down the line, she says.

Posted by toshko under Yasmin News | Comments (0)

 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Birth Control – Avoiding Unwelcome Surprises After Pregnancy

July 26, 2007

Birth control or contraception is a method of protection against unplanned pregnancy. It helps a couple decide whether or not to have a baby.

A woman can have sex after pregnancy albeit some initial mild discomfort for the first two weeks. However, she stands a high chance of becoming pregnant as her menstrual cycle (that had stopped during her pregnancy period) is likely to resume. Since a new baby demands a lot from the family – especially the mother, becoming pregnant again immediately is not something most parents would welcome. Birth control after pregnancy is a safe and stress-free way of avoiding the anxiety of becoming pregnant again.

Just as there are ways for a woman to look good again after pregnancy, there are ways by which she can protect herself against pregnancy as well. In addition, it is important to note that only a few birth control methods protect an individual against sexually transmitted diseases (STD) or HIV/AIDS.

For any birth control method to be effective, it is important for a couple to understand the way it has to be used and the various do’s and don’ts associated with it. Talking to a qualified professional definitely helps and you get to clear your apprehensions before you chose any specific birth control method.

Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM)

LAM is a natural method of birth control during breastfeeding that relies on the postnatal infertility of the woman. Lactation suppresses ovulation hormones. However this is possible only up to the first six months provided the baby is exclusively and frequently breast-fed throughout the day. LAM is no longer effective once menses resume.

Fertility Awareness Method

Also known as natural family planning, this involves studying a woman’s menstrual cycle after pregnancy, to arrive at safe periods for intercourse and practice abstinence during ovulation periods. As a birth control method it is the safest as it does not involve any consumption, implantation or insertion of alien or external drugs or devices. However the success rate of this method depends upon a lot of factors such as self-control and regularity of menses.

Discount Pharmacy - Buy Pharmacy at discount prices including free shipping.Discount Pharmacy provides confortable and easy way to order discount pharmacy online.Barrier Method

Barrier methods such as condoms, sponges, diaphragms and cervical caps with spermicide, bar the sperm from entering the uterus and do not affect the breast milk.

Hormonal Method

Hormonal methods include oral contraceptives (birth control pills), skin patches, injections and vaginal rings comprising estrogen and progestin. Emergency or ‘morning after’ pills taken within three days of intercourse prevent pregnancy. However these are not advisable for lactating mothers as they affect the quantity and quality of milk produced. Also, hormonal methods involve other side-effects that may or may not agree with some women.

Intrauterine Device (IUD)

An IUD (also known as a loop) is a small device of plastic or metal that is inserted into the uterus by a health professional. IUD is a safe contraception that does not affect lactation. It can be removed when a woman wishes to conceive again.

Birth control after pregnancy helps parents exercise their choice of recurring pregnancy. Opting for a safe birth-control method ensures that the mother does not have to worry about becoming pregnant again when her menstrual cycle after pregnancy begins. Sex after pregnancy is not prohibited but one should make sure that it is safe sex. Visit Pregnancy for more information on birth control while breastfeeding, tips to look good after pregnancy, and other issues related to pregnancy and childbirth.

Posted by toshko under Yasmin News | Comments (0)

 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

KU research aimed at birth control for men

July 22, 2007

It may be years before we see it on the market. But researchers at the University of Kansas Medical Center are hard at work in their labs, creating a new option in birth control.”So we’re really excited about this. This is something that rarely happens,” Terranova said.

Dr. Paul Terranova is the Vice Chancellor of Research at the University of Kansas Medical Center.

One of his researchers set out to find a male contraceptive and ten years into the study, he’s making progress.

It’s a form of birth control that may finally take the pressure off women.

“It stops sperm development about half way through the process,” Terranova said.

In the past, steroids have been used to inhibit sperm. The new drug would eliminate the need for steroids.

Internet Pharmacy - Buy Pharmacy at reasanoble prices.Internet Pharmacy provides confortable and easy way to order pharmacy via internet.”Steroids have a lot of side effects and so these compounds they’ve developed seem to target a certain aspect of of sperm development,” Teerranova said.

The study is being performed on rats. Eventually its will move to the human stage to test it’s toxicity and, of course, it’s effectiveness in preventing reproduction.

And like most research, there may be other benefits, too.

“It could be that we stumble across along this path new mechanisms for fertility,” Terranova said.

The only other labs in the country performing similar studies are in Seattle and New York.

But the compound that make those studies possible were discovered right here in Kansas.

Posted by toshko under Yasmin News | Comments (0)

 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

  Next Page »